The newest survey contained step 3 parts. Area We included questions of socio-group analysis (ages, quantity of education, parity, familial money, field, newest relationship position, sexual passion, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you will reputation of unusual cervical cancers examination).
Part II comprised of 6 questions regarding the mark women who will likely be screened, ages first off, regularity, many years otherwise criteria to cease away from evaluation, and methods out of tests. Just the users who’d have you ever heard of HPV do go-ahead in order to Region III and therefore examined information about HPV away from their variety of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), function out-of transmission and protection.
Before the analysis, brand new survey off part II and region III inside Thai version was indeed considered, talked about, and you may modified up until consensus among 20 experts who have been all the gynecologic oncologists (certain was in fact experts various other parallel training). The pros ranked each one of 19 inquiries since sometimes ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The object-level Stuff Authenticity List (I-CVI) are calculated for every product, together with Content Validity Index (CVI) is actually calculated by taking the average ratio away from fourteen questions about information about cervical cancers evaluating and you may 5 questions about HPV. Brand new CVI had been 1 for both areas of the new questionnaire (S1 Dining table). The fresh precision is actually checked when you look at the 31 women with the exact same trait as professionals. The newest Cronbach’ alpha coefficients into reliability was basically 0.819 to own understanding of cervical cancers examination and you may 0.907 to possess understanding of HPV.
Research range
For the time out of booked colposcopy, the analysis assistant provided recommendations of one’s data with the women exactly who met addition standards. The women who provided to participate gave written told agree and you can responded the new survey by themselves themselves prior to continuing to colposcopy.
Study amassed because of it data were socio-group investigation (Area We of your own survey), experience with cervical cancer tumors assessment (Region II), and expertise in HPV (Region III).
Statistical research
The latest responses of knowledge regarding cervical cancer tumors tests and you can HPV have been assessed of the for each items in advance of rating categorization. Proper respond to try obtained as the step one whereas ‘completely wrong and you may being unsure of answer’ is actually obtained 0.
From 14 inquiries out-of cervical cancer testing, women whoever rating was in fact ? 10 have been randomly categorized since with ‘a good knowledge’ usually was in fact considered as with “not good education”. Having experience with HPV, female whose address are ‘never ever observed HPV’ was basically excluded in the investigation from HPV degree https://getbride.org/da/varme-spanske-kvinder/.
Out-of 5 issues, women whose score was indeed ? 3 was basically considered as with ‘an excellent knowledge of HPV’ usually due to the fact ‘not good knowledge’. Off 19 concerns, female whose get had been ? thirteen had been categorized once the having ‘an effective complete knowledge’ otherwise since the ‘not-good overall knowledge’.
All of the research were built-up into the an electronic digital database and you can examined playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were used to research group research and you may was indeed summarized while the amounts which have percentage, mean that have basic departure otherwise average having range. Brand new connection between for each and every variable and knowledge get was indeed reviewed using simple linear regression. Exploratory model was created within the multivariable data in addition to all the parameters possibly about the data score. The fresh new considered amount of mathematical advantages is actually a beneficial p-worth of 0.05 otherwise reduced.
Performance
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>